Questions regarding moderation decisions

[darky]

Originally Posted by dp

forevernow, I personally had no interest in that clip, as the lift itself was not an impressive feat of strength, but nor was I offended by it, which is the reason why I didn't delete it. Other admins may still delete it. I wouldn't have posted it myself, as my personal rule is to never post anything unless the lifter/liftee appears to be post-puberty, just to err on the safe side. However, because the people in this clip were professional youtubers and their accounts are managed by adults, I didn't see any harm from other people posting it. There's nothing sexual about it, and not everything in this forum has to be; at least for me, L&C is just as much about showing feats of strength by females. I mainly post in the wrestling thread, and I often post lifts by female wrestlers that are not attractive to me, simply because they displayed impressive strength. I assume I'm not alone in being fascinated by L&C even when there is no physical attraction involved.

What slips through moderation is the least common denominator of what admins can tolerate, not the least common denominator of what our members find acceptable. We recently had one member complain about cam clips being posted on this forum as well (he believed - probably correctly - that those who order custom cam clips don't have redistribution rights). Other members have argued it is unacceptable to share anything found on instagram and social media, regardless of age. The forum wouldn't have much content if every member could delete everything they find inappropriate to post.

In this case, let's do an experiment: Those that want to have the piggyback ride clip deleted, click the thanks button on this post. If this post gets more thanks than the clip itself, I will delete it. In any case, if anyone wants to discuss changes to the forum's moderation policies, please start a new thread in the discussion forum, don't use the video clips thread for that.

Sorry, but I have to disagree with you there.

I appreciate the time you take to respond, but please be serious. Rules shouldn't be bent to specific cases. I've had a post removed of a 17 year old girl giving a piggy back ride to her boyfriend. Also a celeberty. If the rules are to not post videos of underaged girls, then I don't agree with selective moderating on this.

Either allow non sexual content, or phohibit all underage content. Selective moderating only causes confusion and unnecessary discussions.

A little digging into the forum explains what I mean.
http://landcforum.com/forums/showpos...5&postcount=69
Even talking about underaged girls seems forbidden.
http://landcforum.com/forums/showpos...&postcount=126
http://landcforum.com/forums/showpos...&postcount=127

Im done discussing.