Lift and Carry F/F to the scientific papers

[Daniel]

About noble subtlety in relations woman to woman.

Erotic feeling involves the ratio of polarities, and that it is stronger than the polarity of the qualities of the two sides of the relationship itself. The physical relationship (which is the basis of erotic relationships) is the most important quality of the physical strengths and weaknesses. And here is the weak strong, admires weak etc .. Nowhere is this more holistic, radical and direct way can manifest itself both in terms of L & C. In these respects, care requires maximum power from the bottom and the top is in the most feeble state.
Perfect erotic relationships can only be against women, as it is the female body naturally give affection and care and, especially, to make it. For women only manifestation of tenderness (both passive and active) correspond to the expression of their beauty. And here the most fundamental: who are active affection, tenderness, strength, and who is passive affection, tenderness, weakness. Supernatural status of female beauty implies the opposite in a sense the relationship between physical maturity, body development and physical strength. In part, this inverse relationship has been observed in the widespread (ie in fact more primitive) cultural erotic relationship between a man and a woman. So as they grow older and approach to the flourishing vitality, female gender in gallant relationship does not behave like a more and more strong and active, but rather as a reason to care, grooming, showing its fragility. This behavior looks paradoxical from the standpoint of natural development. However, these are the qualities of the female body be claimed higher erotic culture, and even more so than higher this culture is, the more it is a sophisticated and developed than in more such erotic relationships are human, and not a manifestation of the animal. The proper attitude towards property supernatural means rejection of female beauty for the female body bondage of dependency characteristic of the lower nature, such beauty is not. Therefore, the fact that of all other organisms in appearance and structure, at least in appearance, corresponds to a greater power, various kinds of much activity, we can say and greater aggressiveness in women on the other hand must match the physical weakness, but of weakness, not as inferiority and disadvantage, as well as the perfection, the flourishing vitality, achieve physical maturity. This is the opposite regarding the development of the female body to the physical strength correlate with the very nature of female sexual behavior, especially gallant relationship: so say superwoman is not one that is very active in a relationship, and one that is capable of a greater degree on those of activity against to yourself. The heyday of the physical development (this is something common to all of the body) corresponds to a dense, broad, massive physique (corresponding to the greater maturity of the flesh), United, on the other hand, more stringent, clear, less rounded shapes of the body, especially the face (corresponds to more pleasingly body). The human structure is as: 1) what is the opposite of external fragility, ephemerality, ease of figures; 2) that is opposite circularity amorphous form; 3) what is the opposite of children's immaturity appearance. And as the above polar relevant role in relationships make sense only if they are firmly anchored throughout the full respect of the period in bodily life (ie excluding infancy and old age), and must be linked with developing bodily qualities, it is only right women's division as in a 2 floor: The first female - female, which I call the full-fledged sexually (I also called the type of the Beautiful Lady)
in terms of physical structure - a woman say so powerful and simply styled adding: wide (preferably straight) shoulder, wide hips, not thin waist, not long legs (can be short), a massive skull, sufficiently powerful jaw, generally large, sharply defined and severe facial features, large hands, it is desirable to increase average or above (but the latter - the most insignificant).The second female as I would say, women who start sexual subtiliz amorphous and / or child-infantilize in relation to the physical structure of women .. "sex" I would divide into two ideal types that express several different and partly conflicting ideas:
The first type - the so-called woman with a guitar figure, or a figure hourglass figure or pear etc .: what is considered feminine by adding: narrow shoulders, thin waist, wide hips, not short legs (rather long), big breasts, thin neck, soft, round, small facial features, small head, round face, big eyes, small hands, flowing, feminine movement;
The second type - a woman so to speak of subtle addition - type of cane or photomodelling type: narrow shoulders, small breasts, long, thin legs, thin waist, thin neck, a whole little head, but the person may be a long narrow facial features may be several strict, but tiny, tiny hands, growth here can be any, from the largest to the smallest.
Also, to the ideal of female "sex" and are intermediate between the first and second. The first female - should play a passive role in the physical sexual relations, must be physically weak (especially in terms of the inability to power displays: weight lifting ...) seek to be established must be worn on the hands ... - It does not mean that they should not have a strong character, be active for life, etc. It conforms to the idea of ​​the Beautiful Lady.
The second female - should play an active role in the physical sexual relations should be physically strong, tend to be such, must be worn on the hands of women of the first type, etc. This is me as the type of call girls Knight.
- Here, the concept of knights and beautiful lady is not a historical sense (and even more so the former does not correspond to any military aggression-function), and the meaning of erotic erotic role and identity, what are inseparable from the creative construction holistic human personality creative task. (In eternity only knights and beautiful ladies, and the woman does not have to be a Beautiful Lady, it can be a Knight.)

[TheWolfe]

[Daniel]

I found it on one of the Russian-language Internet sites.

[TheWolfe]

Originally Posted by Daniel

I found it on one of the Russian-language Internet sites.

Aaaaah, okay. I thought you wrote it. It's pretty strange!

[Daniel]

You me very highly! The theory is not my field of activity!

[Daniel]

Originally Posted by Daniel

About noble subtlety in relations woman to woman.

Erotic feeling involves the ratio of polarities, and that it is stronger than the polarity of the qualities of the two sides of the relationship itself. The physical relationship (which is the basis of erotic relationships) is the most important quality of the physical strengths and weaknesses. And here is the weak strong, admires weak etc .. Nowhere is this more holistic, radical and direct way can manifest itself both in terms of L & C. In these respects, care requires maximum power from the bottom and the top is in the most feeble state.
Perfect erotic relationships can only be against women, as it is the female body naturally give affection and care and, especially, to make it. For women only manifestation of tenderness (both passive and active) correspond to the expression of their beauty. And here the most fundamental: who are active affection, tenderness, strength, and who is passive affection, tenderness, weakness. Supernatural status of female beauty implies the opposite in a sense the relationship between physical maturity, body development and physical strength. In part, this inverse relationship has been observed in the widespread (ie in fact more primitive) cultural erotic relationship between a man and a woman. So as they grow older and approach to the flourishing vitality, female gender in gallant relationship does not behave like a more and more strong and active, but rather as a reason to care, grooming, showing its fragility. This behavior looks paradoxical from the standpoint of natural development. However, these are the qualities of the female body be claimed higher erotic culture, and even more so than higher this culture is, the more it is a sophisticated and developed than in more such erotic relationships are human, and not a manifestation of the animal. The proper attitude towards property supernatural means rejection of female beauty for the female body bondage of dependency characteristic of the lower nature, such beauty is not. Therefore, the fact that of all other organisms in appearance and structure, at least in appearance, corresponds to a greater power, various kinds of much activity, we can say and greater aggressiveness in women on the other hand must match the physical weakness, but of weakness, not as inferiority and disadvantage, as well as the perfection, the flourishing vitality, achieve physical maturity. This is the opposite regarding the development of the female body to the physical strength correlate with the very nature of female sexual behavior, especially gallant relationship: so say superwoman is not one that is very active in a relationship, and one that is capable of a greater degree on those of activity against to yourself. The heyday of the physical development (this is something common to all of the body) corresponds to a dense, broad, massive physique (corresponding to the greater maturity of the flesh), United, on the other hand, more stringent, clear, less rounded shapes of the body, especially the face (corresponds to more pleasingly body). The human structure is as: 1) what is the opposite of external fragility, ephemerality, ease of figures; 2) that is opposite circularity amorphous form; 3) what is the opposite of children's immaturity appearance. And as the above polar relevant role in relationships make sense only if they are firmly anchored throughout the full respect of the period in bodily life (ie excluding infancy and old age), and must be linked with developing bodily qualities, it is only right women's division as in a 2 floor: The first female - female, which I call the full-fledged sexually (I also called the type of the Beautiful Lady)
in terms of physical structure - a woman say so powerful and simply styled adding: wide (preferably straight) shoulder, wide hips, not thin waist, not long legs (can be short), a massive skull, sufficiently powerful jaw, generally large, sharply defined and severe facial features, large hands, it is desirable to increase average or above (but the latter - the most insignificant).The second female as I would say, women who start sexual subtiliz amorphous and / or child-infantilize in relation to the physical structure of women .. "sex" I would divide into two ideal types that express several different and partly conflicting ideas:
The first type - the so-called woman with a guitar figure, or a figure hourglass figure or pear etc .: what is considered feminine by adding: narrow shoulders, thin waist, wide hips, not short legs (rather long), big breasts, thin neck, soft, round, small facial features, small head, round face, big eyes, small hands, flowing, feminine movement;
The second type - a woman so to speak of subtle addition - type of cane or photomodelling type: narrow shoulders, small breasts, long, thin legs, thin waist, thin neck, a whole little head, but the person may be a long narrow facial features may be several strict, but tiny, tiny hands, growth here can be any, from the largest to the smallest.
Also, to the ideal of female "sex" and are intermediate between the first and second. The first female - should play a passive role in the physical sexual relations, must be physically weak (especially in terms of the inability to power displays: weight lifting ...) seek to be established must be worn on the hands ... - It does not mean that they should not have a strong character, be active for life, etc. It conforms to the idea of ​​the Beautiful Lady.
The second female - should play an active role in the physical sexual relations should be physically strong, tend to be such, must be worn on the hands of women of the first type, etc. This is me as the type of call girls Knight.
- Here, the concept of knights and beautiful lady is not a historical sense (and even more so the former does not correspond to any military aggression-function), and the meaning of erotic erotic role and identity, what are inseparable from the creative construction holistic human personality creative task. (In eternity only knights and beautiful ladies, and the woman does not have to be a Beautiful Lady, it can be a Knight.)

http://www.prodomme.com/fetishes/lift-and-carry

[zebra]

WTF does this even mean?

[Daniel]

Originally Posted by zebra

WTF does this even mean?

This means that not only lift and carry F/F but generally lift and Carry theoretically susceptible justifications.

[LTemplar]

Originally Posted by Daniel

I found it on one of the Russian-language Internet sites.

Could you please handle a link to it?

[Sheryl27]

For decades of struggling finally women have the same powers and freedoms in all spheres of human activity, including science, by the way, about technological achievements made by women you can read here http://bigessaywriter.com/blog/woman...f-technologies