A sad day

[Lifter]

Originally Posted by WWE4Life

Hey Lifter,

Your position as an all FF lift fan is beyond well-documented, as is your lack of tolerance for any interests other than your own. Based on the history of exchanges in this and other forums from years gone by, it's highly unlikely that you will enjoy clips from my store so I encourage you to spend your dollars elsewhere. As for hearing the other side of the story, I really couldn't care less about earning your approval, nor do I care if he chooses to respond...as it is, it's water under the bridge and my post was in effect, a eulogy to both a lost website and a lost friendship. I thought it would be interesting for others to know that the lift community was a small world, with two producers living practically as neighbours and how the liftnandcarrying site got its start. Let's leave it at that.

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming of lifts and carries.

So revealing that you say "lack of intolerance" on my part and then go ahead and claim: "I couldn't care less". Not very consistent, I'm afraid.
At least you were good enough to understand I, to use your words: "couldn't care less" for the type of material you produce. Fair enough.

[EZ]

The back story was interesting and informing. I highly enjoyed that read.

I can get the complaint about the whole repetitive component to their updates but, honestly, I find that to be the case with ALL lift and carry sites. I think it's the nature of the beast as your shooting videos to showcase one thing: carries. How far can you really take it when each video is going to be of the same thing and one doesn't include a storyline?

For me, as long as the quality of the carry is maintained to a high level and one consistently brings in new talent I am fine with the repetitiveness in video format. And perhaps since I buy videos solely to see the females carried over the shoulder and in a fireman's carry I am by nature more open to the repetitiveness aspect of video, as I am not looking for variety in my videos from the get go?

[Lifter]

Originally Posted by EZ

The back story was interesting and informing. I highly enjoyed that read.

I can get the complaint about the whole repetitive component to their updates but, honestly, I find that to be the case with ALL lift and carry sites. I think it's the nature of the beast as your shooting videos to showcase one thing: carries. How far can you really take it when each video is going to be of the same thing and one doesn't include a storyline?

For me, as long as the quality of the carry is maintained to a high level and one consistently brings in new talent I am fine with the repetitiveness in video format. And perhaps since I buy videos solely to see the females carried over the shoulder and in a fireman's carry I am by nature more open to the repetitiveness aspect of video, as I am not looking for variety in my videos from the get go?

Exactly. Well said, my friend. On the other hand, there is another side to the story, I can't remember the exact details, but a long time ago, the owner of liftn' and carrying told his side of the story on this conflict. We should hear from him to get the complete picture.

[EZ]

Originally Posted by Lifter

Exactly. Well said, my friend. On the other hand, there is another side to the story, I can't remember the exact details, but a long time ago, the owner of liftn' and carrying told his side of the story on this conflict. We should hear from him to get the complete picture.

I recognize that there is always 3 sides to a story so I am not throwing anyone under the bus based off that one story. I just enjoyed learning a little history of the site, of the L&C community as a whole, and left it at that.

[Leobor]

Thats really bad, I liked them a lot.

[warthog]

Meh, I agree with Dave's opinion of this site. The lifts were extremely repetitive and monotone, including the kissing series (which was a good idea poorly executed). Most videos would consist of a girl walking around in circles in a small room carrying someone, with no dialog whatsoever. I don't see how anyone can watch more than one minute of that.
I think studios like Taylor's which at least attempt to act out a scene are MUCH more appealing.

[Slevin]

Originally Posted by Lifter

So revealing that you say "lack of intolerance" on my part and then go ahead and claim: "I couldn't care less". Not very consistent, I'm afraid.
At least you were good enough to understand I, to use your words: "couldn't care less" for the type of material you produce. Fair enough.

First of all, he was talking about your lack of "tolerance" (not "intolerance" as you put it).

Secondly, I think it is quite consistent. Your lack of tolerance for other's material is the reason why he could not care less about earning your approval. So no need for you to be "afraid."

So please stop trying to be a Grammar Nazi on this forum, because clearly you are not very good at it.

I award you zero points for your poor attempt at making yourself seem intelligent at Dave's expense.

[Lifter]

Originally Posted by Slevin

First of all, he was talking about your lack of "tolerance" (not "intolerance" as you put it).

Secondly, I think it is quite consistent. Your lack of tolerance for other's material is the reason why he could not care less about earning your approval. So no need for you to be "afraid."

So please stop trying to be a Grammar Nazi on this forum, because clearly you are not very good at it.

I award you zero points for your poor attempt at making yourself seem intelligent at Dave's expense.

Who rattled your cage?

[Lifter]

Originally Posted by Slevin

First of all, he was talking about your lack of "tolerance" (not "intolerance" as you put it).

Secondly, I think it is quite consistent. Your lack of tolerance for other's material is the reason why he could not care less about earning your approval. So no need for you to be "afraid."

So please stop trying to be a Grammar Nazi on this forum, because clearly you are not very good at it.

I award you zero points for your poor attempt at making yourself seem intelligent at Dave's expense.

Anyway, I think you should check basic terminology, it's not his grammar I took issue with, but his flawed premise: "As for hearing the other side of the story, I really couldn't care less about earning your approval, nor do I care if he chooses to respond...as it is". So, he was being intolerant not only to me, but to the owner of lifting and carrying. Hope you got it.