The Lift & Carry Forums

Go Back   The Lift & Carry Forums > Miscellaneous > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 6th, 2023, 10:48   #1
TheLurker1
VIPOS
 
TheLurker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,432
Total 'Thanks' Received by This User :
0 For This Post
7,718 Total
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjw1971 View Post
Here's an example of a girl casually doing a one-arm chin-up. She looks pretty small, but at least 110-115lbs? But that means she can pull 220-230lbs. just as easily using both arms, right?
Not at all, that isn’t how that works. They are different movements.

However, in all likelihood, she possesses the power for LnC.
__________________
Lifting women since '07
TheLurker1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2023, 19:59   #2
tjw1971
VIP Honored
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 260
Total 'Thanks' Received by This User :
0 For This Post
471 Total
Default re: not how it works

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLurker1 View Post
Not at all, that isn’t how that works. They are different movements.

However, in all likelihood, she possesses the power for LnC.
I understand they're different movements. But it's a more demanding one to do a one-arm pull-up than to hold someone else on your back.

I remember years ago, there were multiple guys commenting on YouTube channels when athletic women would do regular chin-ups, saying "I'll really be impressed if a woman ever does a legit one-arm chin-up.". And for years after that, you never saw it happen. Then, videos started appearing with a few women able to do weighted chin-ups with an extra 25lbs. or what-not. And it progressed from there.

Given the fact women generally have more lower body strength than upper, it's just much more common they've got the leg strength to leg press a stack of weights at the gym, and not to have their legs be the limitation for carrying a guy. It's usually going to be more of a struggle for them to hold a guy up on their back with their arms around his legs. (That's why you sometime see smaller girls giving bigger guys a piggyback by bending over and walking around with him more or less lying across her back, vs standing straight up.)
tjw1971 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2023, 20:27   #3
TheLurker1
VIPOS
 
TheLurker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,432
Total 'Thanks' Received by This User :
0 For This Post
7,718 Total
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjw1971 View Post
I understand they're different movements. But it's a more demanding one to do a one-arm pull-up than to hold someone else on your back.

I remember years ago, there were multiple guys commenting on YouTube channels when athletic women would do regular chin-ups, saying "I'll really be impressed if a woman ever does a legit one-arm chin-up.". And for years after that, you never saw it happen. Then, videos started appearing with a few women able to do weighted chin-ups with an extra 25lbs. or what-not. And it progressed from there.

Given the fact women generally have more lower body strength than upper, it's just much more common they've got the leg strength to leg press a stack of weights at the gym, and not to have their legs be the limitation for carrying a guy. It's usually going to be more of a struggle for them to hold a guy up on their back with their arms around his legs. (That's why you sometime see smaller girls giving bigger guys a piggyback by bending over and walking around with him more or less lying across her back, vs standing straight up.)
My point is that doing a one arm pull up doesn’t mean she can automatically pull 230lbs just as easily.
__________________
Lifting women since '07
TheLurker1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:54.

Clips4sale.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.